[PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: BPF Iterator Document

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fix the description of the seq_info field of the bpf_iter_reg structure which
was wrong due to an accidental copy/paste of the previous field's description.

Fixes: 8972e18a439d ("bpf, docs: BPF Iterator Document")
Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/bpf/bpf_iterators.rst | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/bpf_iterators.rst b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_iterators.rst
index 6d7770793fab..07433915aa41 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/bpf_iterators.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_iterators.rst
@@ -238,11 +238,8 @@ The following is the breakdown for each field in struct ``bpf_iter_reg``.
        that the kernel function cond_resched() is called to avoid other kernel
        subsystem (e.g., rcu) misbehaving.
    * - seq_info
-     - Specifies certain action requests in the kernel BPF iterator
-       infrastructure. Currently, only BPF_ITER_RESCHED is supported. This means
-       that the kernel function cond_resched() is called to avoid other kernel
-       subsystem (e.g., rcu) misbehaving.
-
+     - Specifies the set of seq operations for the BPF iterator and helpers to
+       initialize/free the private data for the corresponding ``seq_file``.
 
 `Click here
 <https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210212183107.50963-2-songliubraving@xxxxxx/>`_
-- 
2.34.1




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux