Re: [PATCH v2] docs/RCU: Bring smp_wmb() back

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 02:53:46PM +0000, Alan Huang wrote:
> There are two memory ordering required in the insertion algorithm,
> we need to make sure obj->key is updated before obj->obj_node.next
> and obj->refcnt, atomic_set_release is not enough to provide the
> required memory barrier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.rst | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.rst b/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.rst
> index e06ed40bb6..77244adbdf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.rst
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ Quoting Corey Minyard::
>  ----------------------
>  
>  We need to make sure a reader cannot read the new 'obj->obj_node.next' value
> -and previous value of 'obj->key'. Otherwise, an item could be deleted
> +and previous value of 'obj->key' at the same time. Otherwise, an item could be deleted
>  from a chain, and inserted into another chain. If new chain was empty
>  before the move, 'next' pointer is NULL, and lockless reader can not
>  detect the fact that it missed following items in original chain.
> @@ -112,7 +112,12 @@ detect the fact that it missed following items in original chain.
>    obj = kmem_cache_alloc(...);
>    lock_chain(); // typically a spin_lock()
>    obj->key = key;
> -  atomic_set_release(&obj->refcnt, 1); // key before refcnt
> +  /*
> +  * we need to make sure obj->key is updated before obj->obj_node.next
> +  * and obj->refcnt
> +  */
> +  smp_wmb();
> +  atomic_set(&obj->refcnt, 1);

You lost me on this one.

>From what I can see, in the original the atomic_set_release() provided
ordering between the ->key assignment and the ->refcnt assignment,
and then the rcu_assign_pointer() within hlist_add_head_rcu() provided
ordering between both the ->key and the ->refcnt assignments on the one
hand and the list insertion on the other.

What am I missing here?

							Thanx, Paul

>    hlist_add_head_rcu(&obj->obj_node, list);
>    unlock_chain(); // typically a spin_unlock()
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux