>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2023 12:18 PM > >Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 09:23:48PM CEST, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:15:14 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>> On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:21:29 +0000 Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote: >>> > Surely, we can skip this discussion and split the nest attr into >something like: >>> > - PIN_A_PIN_PARENT_DEVICE, >>> > - PIN_A_PIN_PARENT_PIN. >>> >>> Yup, exactly. Should a fairly change code wise, if I'm looking right. >> ^ small > >Yeah, that is what we had originally. This just pushes out the >different attr selection from the nest one level up to the actualy >nesting attribute. > >One downside of this is you will have 2 arrays of parent objects, >one per parent type. Current code neatly groups them into a single array. > >I guess this is a matter of personal preference, I'm fine either way. Ok, I will split it. Thank you! Arkadiusz
