On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 12:10 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alex@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 31/05/2023 15:54, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:53:12AM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> >> event_idx default implementation returns 0, not idx + 1.
> > The comment was correct until commit c719f56092ad ("perf: Fix and clean
> > up initialization of pmu::event_idx"). I'm not sure that warrants a fixes
> > tag, but maybe a reference in the commit message.
>
>
> You're right, I'll add a reference, I don't think it deserves a
> backport, that's just a comment.
>
>
With that done:
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> include/linux/perf_event.h | 3 ++-
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> >> index d5628a7b5eaa..56fe43b20966 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> >> @@ -442,7 +442,8 @@ struct pmu {
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Will return the value for perf_event_mmap_page::index for this event,
> >> - * if no implementation is provided it will default to: event->hw.idx + 1.
> >> + * if no implementation is provided it will default to 0 (see
> >> + * perf_event_idx_default).
> >> */
> >> int (*event_idx) (struct perf_event *event); /*optional */
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.37.2
> >>
> > Otherwise,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
--
Regards,
Atish
