The example code snippets on rculist_nulls.rst are assuming 'obj' to have the 'hlist_head' field named 'obj_node', but a sentence is wrongly mentioning 'obj->obj_node.next' as 'obj->obj_next'. Fix it. Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.rst b/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.rst index 94a8bfe9f560..5cd6f3f8810f 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.rst +++ b/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.rst @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ Quoting Corey Minyard:: 2) Insertion algorithm ---------------------- -We need to make sure a reader cannot read the new 'obj->obj_next' value +We need to make sure a reader cannot read the new 'obj->obj_node.next' value and previous value of 'obj->key'. Otherwise, an item could be deleted from a chain, and inserted into another chain. If new chain was empty before the move, 'next' pointer is NULL, and lockless reader can not -- 2.25.1
