Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Palmer suggested at some point, not sure if it was in one of the > weekly linux-riscv syncs, or a conversation at FOSDEM, that we > should document the role of the automation running on our patchwork > instance plays in patch acceptance. > > Add a short note to the patch-acceptance document to that end. > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > I was also not sure if this was the correct doc for this, or whether a > process/maintainer-riscv.rst file was better suited. There's clearly no > rush on this though so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I'm fine with this file. Thanks for adding it! Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
