On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 11:36:18AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Mon, May 01 2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 01/05/2023 12:01, Baruch Siach wrote: > >> On Mon, May 01 2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> On 25/04/2023 10:31, Baruch Siach wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Apr 24 2023, Baruch Siach wrote: > >>>>> Only arm,primecell is documented as compatible string for Primecell > >>>>> peripherals. Current code agrees with that. > >>>> > >>>> Once again my patches do not show up in patchwork. But they do show in > >>>> lore: > >>>> > >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/9e137548c4e76e0d8deef6d49460cb37897934ca.1682333574.git.baruch@xxxxxxxxxx/ > >>> > >>> You used subject prefix which targets Doc subsystem, but did not Cc Doc > >>> maintainers (get_maintainers do not print them). If you target Rob's > >>> Patchwork, probably you need to fix subject prefix. There is no "dt" prefix. > >> > >> Thanks for the tip. > >> > >> All previous commits touching Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst > >> use 'docs' for subject prefix, including one from Rob. I followed this > >> example. > > > > Hm, I see Rob and others indeed used "dt:". I guess Rob's filters might > > need some updates? > > With the merge window behind us, is there anything more I need to do to > get these trivial patches applied? Sorry about this. There's a few things that PW doesn't capture and this is one of them. And then I've been out the last month. Both applied now. Rob
