On 08/08/2013 02:13 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 08/07/2013 06:02 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 08:50:12PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:15:21PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: >>>> On 08/07/2013 10:18 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>>>>> Please let me know, if I should rebase again. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> tip:master is not a stable branch; it is more like linux-next. We need >>>>> to figure out which topic branches are dependencies for this set. >>>> >>>> Okay. I 'll start looking at the branches that would get affected. >>>> (Xen, kvm are obvious ones). >>>> Please do let me know the branches I might have to check for. >>> >>> >From the Xen standpoint anything past v3.11-rc4 would work. >>> >> For KVM as early as past v3.11-rc1 would be OK. >> > > I'm still completely confused as to the base of this patchset. The > first patch has the following hunk for arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h: > Okay, I figured it out. One of several problems with the formatting of this patchset is that it has one- and two-digit patch numbers in the headers, which meant that my scripts tried to apply patch 10 first. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
