Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/07/2013 12:15 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
On 08/07/2013 10:18 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
tip:master is not a stable branch; it is more like linux-next.  We need
to figure out which topic branches are dependencies for this set.

Okay. I 'll start looking at the branches that would get affected.
(Xen, kvm are obvious ones).
Please do let me know the branches I might have to check for.

On Linus tree,
I am seeing patch getting applied to arch/x86/Kconfig at some offset

Hunk #1 succeeded at 632 (offset -31 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 657 (offset -31 lines).

since patches are based on -rc4, Xen, kvm should not have problem
as pointed by Gleb, Konrad.
I did not see change in tip's jumplabel/core-spinlock tree that would
affect it.

Peter, could you please point me to the conflict, so that I can help
there which saves time and trouble to maintainers.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux