Re: [PATCH 3/3] Documentation/arm64: Update ACPI tables from BBR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023/5/18 21:40, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2023-05-18 13:07, Hanjun Guo wrote:
Hi Jose,

On 2023/5/18 18:52, Jose Marinho wrote:
The BBR specification requires (or conditionally requires) a set of ACPI
tables for a proper working system.
This commit updates:
- the list of ACPI tables to reflect the contents of
BBR version 2.0 (see https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0044/g).
- the list of ACPI tables in acpi_object_usage. This last update ensures
that both files remain coherent.

Thanks for the update, some comments inline.


Signed-off-by: Jose Marinho <jose.marinho@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@xxxxxxx>
---
  Documentation/arm64/acpi_object_usage.rst | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++--
  Documentation/arm64/arm-acpi.rst          | 71 +++++++++++++++++---
  2 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/acpi_object_usage.rst b/Documentation/arm64/acpi_object_usage.rst
index 484ef9676653..1da22200fdf8 100644
--- a/Documentation/arm64/acpi_object_usage.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/acpi_object_usage.rst
@@ -17,16 +17,37 @@ For ACPI on arm64, tables also fall into the following categories:
         -  Recommended: BERT, EINJ, ERST, HEST, PCCT, SSDT
-       -  Optional: BGRT, CPEP, CSRT, DBG2, DRTM, ECDT, FACS, FPDT, IBFT, -          IORT, MCHI, MPST, MSCT, NFIT, PMTT, RASF, SBST, SLIT, SPMI, SRAT,
-          STAO, TCPA, TPM2, UEFI, XENV
+       -  Optional: AGDI, BGRT, CEDT, CPEP, CSRT, DBG2, DRTM, ECDT, FACS, FPDT, +          HMAT, IBFT, IORT, MCHI, MPAM, MPST, MSCT, NFIT, PMTT, PPTT, RASF, SBST,
+          SDEI, SLIT, SPMI, SRAT, STAO, TCPA, TPM2, UEFI, XENV
-       -  Not supported: BOOT, DBGP, DMAR, ETDT, HPET, IVRS, LPIT, MSDM, OEMx,
-          PSDT, RSDT, SLIC, WAET, WDAT, WDRT, WPBT
+       -  Not supported: AEST, APMT, BOOT, DBGP, DMAR, ETDT, HPET, IVRS, LPIT,

AEST is ARM Error Source Table, and it can be used for ARM platforms, so
I thinsk AEST is not belong to "Not supportted", "Optional" instead.

Can you point to the code in Linux which does anything with AEST, optionally or otherwise? ;)
and APMT is the same.

+          MSDM, OEMx, PDTT, PSDT, RAS2, RSDT, SLIC, WAET, WDAT, WDRT, WPBT

PDTT and RAS2 are now used for ARM too, please move it to Optional :)

Ditto; as stated in arm-acpi.rst this is Linux documentation covering the interaction between Linux and ACPI. It is not some kind of generic

Hmm, let me see...

OK, I checked the arm-acpi.rst, it is saying:

"Detailed expectations for ACPI tables and object are listed in the file
Documentation/arm64/acpi_object_usage.rst."

So if I remember correctly, it is the guidance of ACPI tables and
methods usage on arm64, to align with the BBR.

ACPI-on-Arm guidance whitepaper. If and when Linux actually supports these tables in the sense of meaningfully consuming them, that is when we can document such support.

If this is the case, we don't need categories of "Required",
"Recommmened" and etc.

Thanks
Hanjun



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux