Re: [PATCH 01/40] lib/string_helpers: Drop space in string_get_size's output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 12:28 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 5/3/23 00:50, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 07:42:59AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 23:17 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> >> > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 10:22:18PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> > > It is not used just for debug.  It's used all over the kernel for
> >> > > printing out device sizes.  The output mostly goes to the kernel
> >> > > print buffer, so it's anyone's guess as to what, if any, tools are
> >> > > parsing it, but the concern about breaking log parsers seems to be
> >> > > a valid one.
> >> >
> >> > Ok, there is sd_print_capacity() - but who in their right mind would
> >> > be trying to scrape device sizes, in human readable units,
> >>
> >> If you bother to google "kernel log parser", you'll discover it's quite
> >> an active area which supports a load of company business models.
> >
> > That doesn't mean log messages are unchangable ABI. Indeed, we had
> > the whole "printk_index_emit()" addition recently to create
> > an external index of printk message formats for such applications to
> > use. [*]
> >
> >> >  from log messages when it's available in sysfs/procfs (actually, is
> >> > it in sysfs? if not, that's an oversight) in more reasonable units?
> >>
> >> It's not in sysfs, no.  As aren't a lot of things, which is why log
> >> parsing for system monitoring is big business.
> >
> > And that big business is why printk_index_emit() exists to allow
> > them to easily determine how log messages change format and come and
> > go across different kernel versions.
> >
> >> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've yet to hear about kernel log
> >> > messages being consider a stable interface, and this seems a bit out
> >> > there.
> >>
> >> It might not be listed as stable, but when it's known there's a large
> >> ecosystem out there consuming it we shouldn't break it just because you
> >> feel like it.
> >
> > But we've solved this problem already, yes?
> >
> > If the userspace applications are not using the kernel printk format
> > index to detect such changes between kernel version, then they
> > should be. This makes trivial issues like whether we have a space or
> > not between units is completely irrelevant because the entry in the
> > printk format index for the log output we emit will match whatever
> > is output by the kernel....
>
> If I understand that correctly from the commit changelog, this would have
> indeed helped, but if the change was reflected in format string. But with
> string_get_size() it's always an %s and the change of the helper's or a
> switch to another variant of the helper that would omit the space, wouldn't
> be reflected in the format string at all? I guess that would be an argument
> for Andy's suggestion for adding a new %pt / %pT which would then be

(Note, there is no respective %p extension for string_get_size() yet.
%pt is for time and was used as an example when its evolution included
a change like this)

> reflected in the format string. And also more concise to use than using the
> helper, fwiw.



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux