On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, Carlos Bilbao wrote: > On 4/27/23 7:29 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > I agree with Dave that I think the goal of this document is not to come up with a > > fancy name (I am fine with call it anything), but to introduce kernel developers to the > > new Linux threat model angle for this-particular-use-case-of-confidential-computing. > > So that when we submit the hardening mechanisms in the future people are > > already familiar with why we need to do this and we don’t have to repeat this story > > again and again. > > Yes! To reiterate, there's two things we definitely wish to do: > > 1. Narrow down the problem: This new document can be specific to CoCo in > virtual environments. v2 should be clear about that. Then rename the document as I already suggested. If you want to claim confidential-computing.rst, then IMO such a doc needs to be written something like the surprisingly good Wikipedia article[*]. Until one of those two things happens, my NAK stands. [*] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidential_computing
