On 08/01/2013 08:31 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > Palmas series device like TPS65913, TPS80036 supports the backup battery > for powering the RTC when no other energy source is available. > > The backup battery is optional, connected to the VBACKUP pin, and can be > nonrechargeable or rechargeable. The rechargeable battery can be charged > from the system supply using the backup battery charger. > > Add support for enabling charging of this backup battery. Also add the DT > binding document and the new properties to have this support. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-palmas.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-palmas.txt > +Palmas RTC controller bindings > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: > + - "ti,palmas-rtc" for palma series of the RTC controller Nit: Here is another Palma -vs- Palmas inconsistency. What is the correct name for the device; Palma or Palmas? Either way, the should always have an initial capital letter in free-form text (i.e. but not in property/node names). Aside from that, the binding looks fine to me now, assuming it's fully describing the RTC module's functionality. So, the binding, Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
