Hello, On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 04:33:29PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > I think we can. You mean having a new "cpuset.cpus.isolated" cgroupfs file. > So there will be one in the root cgroup that defines all the isolated CPUs > one can have. It is then distributed down the hierarchy and can be claimed > only if a cgroup becomes an "isolated" partition. There will be a slight Yeah, that seems a lot more congruent with the typical pattern. > change in the semantics of an "isolated" partition, but I doubt there will > be much users out there. I haven't thought through it too hard but what prevents staying compatible with the current behavior? > If you are OK with this approach, I can modify my patch series to do that. Thanks. -- tejun
