On 07/31/2013 01:22 AM, Bill Huang wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 21:17 +0800, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/30/2013 07:05 AM, Bill Huang wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt
index 30b0581..4adca2a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt
@@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ Optional nodes:
ti,smps-range - OTP has the wrong range set for the hardware so override
0 - low range, 1 - high range.
+- ti,system-power-controller: Telling whether or not this pmic is controlling
controller or master?
We name it controller since it controls the system power of the
platform, I'm not sure will it make more sense to be master? Or does it
makes sense to other pmic which also control the system power (the same
property are already used in pmic TPS6586x and TPS65910).
No strong feelings either way, especially if there is precedence.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
