Sorry for taking eternities to look into this.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Christian Ruppert
<christian.ruppert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The pinmux driver of the Abilis Systems TB10x platform based on ARC700 CPUs.
> Used to control the pinmux and is a prerequisite for the GPIO driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Pierrick Hascoet <pierrick.hascoet@xxxxxxxxxx>
(...)
> +The following pin groups are available:
> + - GPIO ports: gpioa_pins, gpiob_pins, gpioc_pins, gpiod_pins, gpioe_pins,
> + gpiof_pins, gpiog_pins, gpioh_pins, gpioi_pins, gpioj_pins,
> + gpiok_pins, gpiol_pins, gpiom_pins, gpion_pins
I would not attempt to define groups for all GPIO pins.
(...)
> +gpioa: gpio@FF140000 {
> + compatible = "abilis,tb10x-gpio";
> + reg = <0xFF140000 0x1000>;
> + gpio-controller;
> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> + ngpio = <3>;
> + gpio-ranges = <&iomux 0 0>;
> + gpio-ranges-group-names = "gpioa_pins";
This uses that feature to define GPIO ranges from a group does
it not? I'm not certain about that feature.
I don't see any of the port concept creeping into the device tree
in this version and that is how I think it should be kept:
the "port" particulars is a thing for the driver and not the
device tree.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
