On 3/22/23 15:04, Ken Goldman wrote: > I'm writing documentation on IMA targeting users (not kernel developers). It includes concepts, details on writing policies, the IMA event log format, utilities, and more. It aggregates existing scattered documentation, but adds much more. It's maybe 1/2 done. > > Questions: > > 1. Are there people who could look at it and see if I'm on the right path? > > It's a lot of work. I'd like to know that it has some chance of acceptance. Review in terms of IMA-specific content? or in terms of ReST usage? or in general terms to see if it is appropriate for kernel tree documentation? I think that you should Cc: linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for their input as well as linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Several of us here can look at it for general review feedback. > 2. What is the process for getting a block of documentation added to https://www.kernel.org/doc/html? >From last week's email: >>> It should be added to the kernel tree in the Documentation/userspace-api/ subdirectory >>> or Documentation/security/ subdirectory. The kernel.org/doc/ web pages are generated >>> from what is in the Linux kernel tree. although if you don't think that it is appropriate for either of those subdirectories, just explain and justify that and it might be possible to put it somewhere else. -- ~Randy
