Hi Rafael, On 17 Mar 19:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 12:28 PM Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From ACPI spec[1] below 3 modes for CPPC can be defined: > > 1. Non autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies operating frequency/ > > performance level through `Desired Performance` register and platform > > follows that. > > 2. Guided autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies min and max > > frequencies/ performance levels through `Minimum Performance` and > > `Maximum Performance` register, and platform can autonomously select an > > operating frequency in this range. > > 3. Fully autonomous: OS only hints (via EPP) to platform for the required > > energy performance preference for the workload and platform autonomously > > scales the frequency. > > > > Currently (1) is supported by amd_pstate as passive mode, and (3) is > > implemented by EPP support[2]. This change is to support (2). > > > > In guided autonomous mode the min_perf is based on the input from the > > scaling governor. For example, in case of schedutil this value depends > > on the current utilization. And max_perf is set to max capacity. > > > > To activate guided auto mode ``amd_pstate=guided`` command line > > parameter has to be passed in the kernel. > > > > Below are the results (normalized) of benchmarks with this patch: > > System: Genoa 96C 192T > > Kernel: 6.3-rc1 + patch > > Scaling governor: schedutil > > > > ================ dbench comparisons ================ > > dbench result comparison: > > Here results are throughput (MB/s) > > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct) > > 2 1.07 (0.00 pct) 1.06 (-0.93 pct) 1.07 (0.00 pct) > > 4 1.68 (0.00 pct) 1.70 (1.19 pct) 1.72 (2.38 pct) > > 8 2.61 (0.00 pct) 2.68 (2.68 pct) 2.76 (5.74 pct) > > 16 4.16 (0.00 pct) 4.24 (1.92 pct) 4.53 (8.89 pct) > > 32 5.98 (0.00 pct) 6.17 (3.17 pct) 7.30 (22.07 pct) > > 64 8.67 (0.00 pct) 8.99 (3.69 pct) 10.71 (23.52 pct) > > 128 11.98 (0.00 pct) 12.52 (4.50 pct) 14.67 (22.45 pct) > > 256 15.73 (0.00 pct) 16.13 (2.54 pct) 17.81 (13.22 pct) > > 512 15.77 (0.00 pct) 16.32 (3.48 pct) 16.39 (3.93 pct) > > dbench power comparison: > > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (4.00 pct) > > 2 0.99 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-2.02 pct) 1.02 (3.03 pct) > > 4 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.98 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct) > > 8 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (1.02 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct) > > 16 0.99 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (1.01 pct) 1.04 (5.05 pct) > > 32 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.07 (4.90 pct) > > 64 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.11 (5.71 pct) > > 128 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.15 (6.48 pct) > > 256 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (7.14 pct) > > 512 1.18 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (-0.84 pct) 1.26 (6.77 pct) > > > > ================ git-source comparisons ================ > > git-source result comparison: > > Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec) > > Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > > 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.93 (-7.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) > > git-source power comparison: > > Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > > 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.96 (-4.00 pct) > > > > ================ kernbench comparisons ================ > > kernbench result comparison: > > Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec) > > Load: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > > 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct) > > 48 1.26 (0.00 pct) 1.28 (1.58 pct) 1.25 (-0.79 pct) > > 64 1.39 (0.00 pct) 1.47 (5.75 pct) 1.43 (2.87 pct) > > 96 1.48 (0.00 pct) 1.50 (1.35 pct) 1.49 (0.67 pct) > > 128 1.29 (0.00 pct) 1.32 (2.32 pct) 1.33 (3.10 pct) > > 192 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) 1.21 (3.41 pct) > > 256 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.18 (0.85 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) > > 384 1.16 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (0.86 pct) 1.21 (4.31 pct) > > kernbench power comparison: > > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > > 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) > > 48 0.87 (0.00 pct) 0.81 (-6.89 pct) 0.88 (1.14 pct) > > 64 0.81 (0.00 pct) 0.73 (-9.87 pct) 0.77 (-4.93 pct) > > 96 0.75 (0.00 pct) 0.74 (-1.33 pct) 0.75 (0.00 pct) > > 128 0.83 (0.00 pct) 0.79 (-4.81 pct) 0.83 (0.00 pct) > > 192 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) > > 256 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) > > 384 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) > > > > ================ tbench comparisons ================ > > tbench result comparison: > > Here results are throughput (MB/s) > > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.70 (-30.00 pct) 1.37 (37.00 pct) > > 2 2.64 (0.00 pct) 1.39 (-47.34 pct) 2.70 (2.27 pct) > > 4 4.89 (0.00 pct) 2.75 (-43.76 pct) 5.28 (7.97 pct) > > 8 9.46 (0.00 pct) 5.42 (-42.70 pct) 10.22 (8.03 pct) > > 16 19.05 (0.00 pct) 10.42 (-45.30 pct) 19.94 (4.67 pct) > > 32 37.50 (0.00 pct) 20.23 (-46.05 pct) 36.87 (-1.68 pct) > > 64 61.24 (0.00 pct) 43.08 (-29.65 pct) 62.96 (2.80 pct) > > 128 67.16 (0.00 pct) 69.08 (2.85 pct) 67.34 (0.26 pct) > > 256 154.59 (0.00 pct) 162.33 (5.00 pct) 156.78 (1.41 pct) > > 512 154.02 (0.00 pct) 156.74 (1.76 pct) 153.48 (-0.35 pct) > > tbench power comparison: > > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.08 (8.00 pct) > > 2 1.04 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-6.73 pct) 1.11 (6.73 pct) > > 4 1.12 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (-11.60 pct) 1.18 (5.35 pct) > > 8 1.25 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (-16.80 pct) 1.31 (4.80 pct) > > 16 1.53 (0.00 pct) 1.13 (-26.14 pct) 1.58 (3.26 pct) > > 32 2.01 (0.00 pct) 1.36 (-32.33 pct) 2.03 (0.99 pct) > > 64 2.58 (0.00 pct) 2.14 (-17.05 pct) 2.61 (1.16 pct) > > 128 2.80 (0.00 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) > > 256 3.39 (0.00 pct) 3.43 (1.17 pct) 3.42 (0.88 pct) > > 512 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) > > > > Change log: > > > > v7 -> v8: > > - Rebased on top of 6.3-rc1 tip > > - Pickup tested-by flag by Oleksandr > > This series has been applied as 6.4 material, but I generally prefer > ACPI and CPPC to be spelled in capitals in patch subjects and you > should be more careful about comments and white space added by your > patches (I have fixed up a few assorted issues of these types in the > patches). > > Thanks! Thank you for taking this patch series. Regards, Wyes > > > v6 -> v7: > > - Addressed comments by Ray > > - Reorder and rebase patches > > - Pick up Ack by Ray > > > > v5 -> v6: > > - Don't return -EBUSY when changing to same mode > > > > v4 -> v5: > > - Rebased on top of EPP v12 series > > - Addressed comments form Mario regarding documentation > > - Picked up RB flags from Mario and Bagas Sanjaya > > > > v3 -> v4: > > - Fixed active mode low frequency issue reported by Peter Jung and Tor Vic > > - Documentation modification suggested by Bagas Sanjaya > > > > v2 -> v3: > > - Addressed review comments form Mario. > > - Picked up RB tag from Mario. > > - Rebase on top of EPP v11 [3]. > > > > v1 -> v2: > > - Fix issue with shared mem systems. > > - Rebase on top of EPP series. > > > > [1]: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf > > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221110175847.3098728-1-Perry.Yuan@xxxxxxx/ > > [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20230131090016.3970625-1-perry.yuan@xxxxxxx/ > > > > Wyes Karny (6): > > acpi: cppc: Add min and max perf reg writing support > > acpi: cppc: Add auto select register read/write support > > Documentation: cpufreq: amd-pstate: Move amd_pstate param to > > alphabetical order > > cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add guided autonomous mode > > cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add guided mode control support via sysfs > > Documentation: cpufreq: amd-pstate: Update amd_pstate status sysfs for > > guided > > > > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 40 ++-- > > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 31 ++- > > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 121 +++++++++++- > > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 177 +++++++++++++----- > > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 11 ++ > > include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 2 + > > 6 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.34.1 > >
