A good optimizing compiler should not compile this any differently, but it is nicer to work directly with integers instead of memcpy(). Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> --- v2: Fix kernel test robot complaint about wrong endianness on loongarch: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303121323.Jd35Q1Au-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ --- drivers/block/nbd.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c index 8a9487e79f1c..94ae85400b46 100644 --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c @@ -560,7 +560,6 @@ static int nbd_send_cmd(struct nbd_device *nbd, struct nbd_cmd *cmd, int index) unsigned long size = blk_rq_bytes(req); struct bio *bio; u64 handle; - __be64 tmp; u32 type; u32 nbd_cmd_flags = 0; int sent = nsock->sent, skip = 0; @@ -607,8 +606,7 @@ static int nbd_send_cmd(struct nbd_device *nbd, struct nbd_cmd *cmd, int index) request.len = htonl(size); } handle = nbd_cmd_handle(cmd); - tmp = cpu_to_be64(handle); - memcpy(request.handle, &tmp, sizeof(tmp)); + request.cookie = cpu_to_be64(handle); trace_nbd_send_request(&request, nbd->index, blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd)); @@ -729,14 +727,12 @@ static struct nbd_cmd *nbd_handle_reply(struct nbd_device *nbd, int index, int result; struct nbd_cmd *cmd; struct request *req = NULL; - __be64 tmp; u64 handle; u16 hwq; u32 tag; int ret = 0; - memcpy(&tmp, reply->handle, sizeof(tmp)); - handle = be64_to_cpu(tmp); + handle = be64_to_cpu(reply->cookie); tag = nbd_handle_to_tag(handle); hwq = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(tag); if (hwq < nbd->tag_set.nr_hw_queues) -- 2.39.2
