Xujun Leng <lengxujun2007@xxxxxxx> writes: > In the second paragraph of section "Respond to review comments", there is > a spelling mistake: "aganst" should be "against". > > Signed-off-by: Xujun Leng <lengxujun2007@xxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > index eac7167dce83..69ce64e03c70 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ for their time. Code review is a tiring and time-consuming process, and > reviewers sometimes get grumpy. Even in that case, though, respond > politely and address the problems they have pointed out. When sending a next > version, add a ``patch changelog`` to the cover letter or to individual patches > -explaining difference aganst previous submission (see > +explaining difference against previous submission (see > :ref:`the_canonical_patch_format`). Applied, thanks. jon
