On 2023/03/07 0:20, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
> Hello Akira,
>
> On 3/6/23 09:13, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> Minor nits in the Subject and Sob area.
>>
>> On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 07:44:20 -0600, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
>>> Subject: [PATCH] docs/sp_SP: Add process deprecated translation
>>
>> This summary looks ambiguous to me.
>>
>> Maybe
>>
>> docs/sp_SP: Add translation of process/deprecated
>
> This summary follows the same format followed in the past. Some examples:
>
> docs/sp_SP: Add process coding-style translation
> docs/sp_SP: Add process magic-number translation
> docs/sp_SP: Add process programming-language translation
> docs/sp_SP: Add process email-clients translation
Let me explain why "Add process deprecated translation" looks
ambiguous.
"deprecated translation" can be interpreted as "some translation
which is deprecated".
Of course you don't need to agree.
>
>>
>> ??
>>
>>> Translate Documentation/process/deprecated.rst into Spanish.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@xxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez <sergio.collado@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> To me, Co-developed-by: from the author of the patch looks
>> strange, because it is obvious the author did some development on
>> the patch.
>>
>
> No, we both worked on this patch so Co-developed-by: is the appropriate
> tagging. That being said, Sergio translated more than I did, so I put
> him as sole Translator in the document itself.
Hmm, anyway I don't think you are following the rule of Co-developed-by:
explained in submitting-patches.rst.
Again, you don't need to agree... ;-)
Thanks, Akira
>
>> Which is your intent:
>>
>> Author: Carlos
>> Co-developer: Sergio
>>
>> , or
>>
>> Author: Sergio
>> Co-developer: Carlos
>>
>> ???
>>
>> Thanks, Akira
>>
>>> ---
>>> .../translations/sp_SP/process/deprecated.rst | 381 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> .../translations/sp_SP/process/index.rst | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 382 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/sp_SP/process/deprecated.rst
>> [...]
>
> Thanks,
> Carlos
