Re: [PATCH] Documentation: gpu: add acceleration node section

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm thinking the drm_file.h reference is broken.  I suspect it should
reference Documentation/accel/index.rst

Oded?

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 9:25 PM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 02:52:52AM +0000, Dylan Le wrote:
> >
> > This patch was initially written for the Linux Kernel Bug Fixing Mentorship
> > program. The patch adds a temporarily stubbed section on Acceleration Nodes
> > to resolve a documentation warning.
> >
> > This resolves the warning:
> > ./Documentation/gpu/drm-internals:179: ./include/drm/drm_file.h:411: WARNING: undefined label: drm_accel_node
>
> Please write the patch description in imperative mood ("Do foo" instead
> of "This patch does foo").
>
> >
> > I would appreciate any feedback on what should be documented here.
>
> I think above is better placed between the three dashes and diffstat ...
>
>
> > ---
>
> like here.
>
> >  Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
>
> > +.. _drm_accel_node:
> > +
> > +Acceleration nodes
> > +==================
> > +
> > +.. note::
> > +   There is not any documentation yet need to figure out what this is.
>
> I'd like to write this stub as generic .. admonition:: block [1] instead,
> with the content which is "This section is empty, add appropriate
> documentation here." or similar.
>
> [1]: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#generic-admonition
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux