Hi Mickaël, On 2/27/23 12:02, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > > On 25/02/2023 00:00, Alex Colomar wrote: >> Hi Günther, >> >> On 2/21/23 17:52, Günther Noack wrote: >> [...] >> >> Sorry for taking so much time in looking into this! >> >>> + * >>> + * * The reparented file may not gain more access rights in the destination >>> + * directory than it previously had in the source directory. If this is >>> + * attempted, the operation results in an ``EXDEV`` error. >>> + * >>> + * * When linking or renaming, the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_*`` right for the >>> + * respective file type must be granted for the destination directory. >>> + * Otherwise, the operation results in an ``EACCES`` error. >>> + * >>> + * * When renaming, the ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_*`` right for the >>> + * respective file type must be granted for the source directory. Otherwise, >>> + * the operation results in an ``EACCES`` error. >>> + * >>> + * If multiple requirements are not met, the ``EACCES`` error code takes >>> + * precedence over ``EXDEV``. >> >> Is this something worth guaranteeing, or just an implementation detail >> that may easily change? > > There is a deliberate effort to keep this error priority to be able to > know if a rename or link action can be replaced with a file copy, which > is useful e.g., for `mv`. Thanks. Then it LGTM. Cheers! Alex -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
