On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 12:18 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Works for me. > > I've got a few other things in the pipeline for this merge window so > this probably won't make it, but I'll dig in after that. We've got a > bunch of Rust-types floating around Rivos as well, so with any luck > someone else will have some time to poke around. Having a full cycle in > linux-next is probably the right way to go for this sort of thing > anyway, as it's likely to shake out some long-tail issues. Thanks a lot! That would be great. At least from our side, no rush. In fact, we are letting users (or arch maintainers) to request/submit the architectures themselves as they need/want them. Cheers, Miguel
