Harsh Mishra <hmisraji07@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > ------ > > Dear Maintainers and Mentors, > I have successfully compeleted the task "Documentation Task" under "Linux Kernel Bug Fixing Spring 2023" Mentee Application. > I have also solved a minor documentation warning in Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/cross-thread-rsb.rst . > Please have a look into it > Regards, > Harsh Mishra Thank you for working to improve our documentation! That said, I do have a few requests, starting with: - Please read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for information on how your changelog should be written. Among other things, the changelog should be *above* the '---' line, briefly describe the problem and why it needs to be fixed, and not contain extraneous information. > Signed-off-by: Harsh Mishra <hmisraji07@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/cross-thread-rsb.rst | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/cross-thread-rsb.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/cross-thread-rsb.rst > index ec6e9f5bcf9e..d0fd6cf44911 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/cross-thread-rsb.rst > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/cross-thread-rsb.rst > @@ -88,5 +88,4 @@ capability to override those interceptions, but since this is not common, the > mitigation that covers this path is not enabled by default. > > The mitigation for the KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS capability can be turned on > -using the boolean module parameter mitigate_smt_rsb, e.g.: > - kvm.mitigate_smt_rsb=1 > +using the boolean module parameter mitigate_smt_rsb, e.g.: kvm.mitigate_smt_rsb=1 This is not a terrible fix, but may not be the best one. Most likely, the author wanted this as a literal block: ...the boolean module parameter mitigate_smt_rsb, e.g.:: kvm.mitigate_smt_rsb=1 Thanks, jon
