On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:51:17PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > Hey Evan, > > Just as a preface, I'm reviewing this lot from a position of ignorance > on what glibc wants so I'll refrain from commenting on call itself. > I figure that since the commentary has kinda died on the sysfs front & > Palmer seems to be still into the syscall stuff, that we're pushing on > with this approach... If I can find time (that's a big if, atm) I'd be willing to do a sysfs prototype just for comparison/benchmarking purposes, even if the chances it gets merged are low. But, time... Thanks, drew
