On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 19:05:53 PST (-0800), bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 11:57:01PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
When adding the ISA string ordering rules, I didn't sufficiently indent
one of the list items.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: f07b2b3f9d47 ("Documentation: riscv: add a section about ISA string ordering in /proc/cpuinfo")
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Seems like you forget to add link to the report:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/202301300743.bp7Dpazv-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
Is that the normal way to do it? I've only been adding the Reported-by
like the bot suggests, but I guess it's kind of nice information to have
the bug report as well. From looking at git history it's kind of a mix.
Maybe the bot should suggest this in the bug report, right next to the other
tag?
---
Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst b/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst
index 2ebec4c52230..8960fac42c40 100644
--- a/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/riscv/uabi.rst
@@ -21,10 +21,10 @@ so for our purposes the following rules apply:
single-letter extensions and before any higher-privileged extensions.
#. For additional standard extensions, the first letter following the 'Z'
- conventionally indicates the most closely related alphabetical
- extension category. If multiple 'Z' extensions are named, they will be ordered
- first by category, in canonical order, as listed above, then alphabetically
- within a category.
+ conventionally indicates the most closely related alphabetical
+ extension category. If multiple 'Z' extensions are named, they will be
+ ordered first by category, in canonical order, as listed above, then
+ alphabetically within a category.
#. Standard supervisor-level extensions (starting with 'S') will be listed
after standard unprivileged extensions. If multiple supervisor-level
The warning is fixed, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
