Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] bpf/docs: Update design QA to be consistent with kfunc lifecycle docs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Wed,  8 Feb 2023 17:41:43 +0100 you wrote:
> Cong pointed out that there are some inconsistencies between the BPF design
> QA and the lifecycle expectations documentation we added for kfuncs. Let's
> update the QA file to be consistent with the kfunc docs, and add references
> where it makes sense. Also document that modules may export kfuncs now.
> 
> v3:
> - Grammar nit + ack from David
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v3] bpf/docs: Update design QA to be consistent with kfunc lifecycle docs
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/27b53b7364e3

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux