Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 2/8] sfc: add devlink info support for ef100

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/8/23 14:38, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 03:25:13PM CET, alejandro.lucero-palau@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero-palau@xxxxxxx>
> [..]
>
>
>> +static int efx_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *devlink,
>> +				struct devlink_info_req *req,
>> +				struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> +	struct efx_devlink *devlink_private = devlink_priv(devlink);
>> +	struct efx_nic *efx = devlink_private->efx;
>> +	int rc;
>> +
>> +	/* Several different MCDI commands are used. We report first error
>> +	 * through extack along with total number of errors. Specific error
>> +	 * information via system messages.
> I think you forgot to remove this comment.
>
> With this nit fixed, free free to add:
> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxx>
>

I'll do.

Thanks

>
>> +	 */
>> +	rc = efx_devlink_info_board_cfg(efx, req);
>> +	if (rc) {
>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Getting board info failed");
>> +		return rc;
>> +	}
>> +	rc = efx_devlink_info_stored_versions(efx, req);
>> +	if (rc) {
>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Getting stored versions failed");
>> +		return rc;
>> +	}
>> +	rc = efx_devlink_info_running_versions(efx, req);
>> +	if (rc) {
>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Getting running versions failed");
>> +		return rc;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
> [..]
>




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux