On Friday 19 July 2013 12:47 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> On Thursday 18 July 2013 02:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> >> Since the cross-bar is not limited t0 IRQ lines and applicable for >> DMA request lines as well, making it IRQ chip doesn't make sense. Its >> not typical pin control functionality either but at least that framework >> is much closer to consider as an option. >> >> Actually its more of setting up the IRQ and DMA pins maps once >> at boot for a given SOC based on chosen configuration by the >> board. So I am leaning towards pinctrl as well. Just haven't >> thought enough about whether thats the best approach. >> >> CC'ing Linus W and Tony L whether we can use pinctrl framework >> for such an IP and if yes how ;-). > If it really muxes signals then using pinctrl seems logical. > Especially if the registers are in the SCM block. > > It might be already possible to handle it already with > pinctrl-single,bits for the muxing part. I also thought of using the pinctrl itself. But then i wanted to have the error handling as well, hence did this. Regards, Sricharan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
