Re: [PATCH 31/35] Documentation: trace: correct spelling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 1/27/23 00:54, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> On 1/27/23 07:40, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> --- a/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
>> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ In Linux terms, the runtime verification
>>  *RV monitor* abstraction. A *RV monitor* includes a reference model of the
>>  system, a set of instances of the monitor (per-cpu monitor, per-task monitor,
>>  and so on), and the helper functions that glue the monitor to the system via
>> -trace, as depicted bellow::
>> +trace, as depicted below::
>>  
>>   Linux   +---- RV Monitor ----------------------------------+ Formal
>>    Realm  |                                                  |  Realm
> 
> Do you mind making the rv part an independent patch?
> 
> Spiting it helps in the backport of the fix to stable/distro kernels.

I wouldn't expect this to be packported. stable-kernel-rules.rst says:

 - It cannot contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes,
   whitespace cleanups, etc).

-- 
~Randy



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux