On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 22:40:00 -0800 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Correct spelling problems for Documentation/tools/rtla/ as reported > by codespell. > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- Steve > Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff -- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst > --- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst > +++ b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ and then when the *timerlat* thread was > then be used as the starting point of a more fine-grained analysis. > > Note that **rtla timerlat** was dispatched without changing *timerlat* tracer > -threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads hava > +threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads have > priority *FIFO:95* by default, which is a common priority used by real-time > kernel developers to analyze scheduling delays. >
