Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] ptrace,syscall_user_dispatch: Implement Syscall User Dispatch Suspension

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/26, Gregory Price wrote:
>
> So basic questions are:
> 1) Andrei do you think any injection occurs during quiesce that can't be
>    worked around?
>
> 2) Oleg is the auto-clearing nature of the flag sufficient justification
>    for keeping SUSPEND?

I understand that SUSPEND is more convenient for CRIU and more "safe".

But. This kernel is already overbloated ;) IMO, if SUSPEND is not strictly
necessary, it should be dropped.

Oleg.




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux