On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 03:43:11PM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> We could make a rule that no more resctrl related features are added to
> cpuinfo but I am hesitant to remove the ones that are already there.
Yes, that makes sense.
And note that we try for /proc/cpuinfo to contain flags where the kernel has
received (substantial) enablement work to support a feature. Shadow stack would
be one good example.
If resctrl needs to use a feature and it cannot use that feature without kernel
enablement, then yes, by all means, it should use /proc/cpuinfo and not the
corresponding CPUID bit. Because the presence of the flag in /proc/cpuinfo says
"yes, you can use the feature and the kernel you're running on has the required
support."
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
