Re: [PATCH net-next 06/10] nfp: fill IPsec state validation failure reason

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 04:09:20PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 04:00:19PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Rely on extack to return failure reason.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> One minor suggestion below, but regardless this looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > ---
> >  .../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/crypto/ipsec.c | 38 +++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/crypto/ipsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/crypto/ipsec.c
> > index 41b98f2b7402..7af41cbc8c0b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/crypto/ipsec.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/crypto/ipsec.c
> 
> ...
> 
> >  	if (x->xso.type != XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_CRYPTO) {
> > -		nn_err(nn, "Unsupported xfrm offload tyoe\n");
> > +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Unsupported xfrm offload tyoe");
> 
> While we are here, maybe s/tyoe/type/ ?

Sure, will fix.

Thanks

> 
> ...



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux