On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:52 AM Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 01:00:00PM -0800, Nathan Huckleberry wrote: > > This sounds fine to me. How do you feel about a config flag to change > > the default WQ_HIGHPRI scheduler policy and a sysfs node to update the > > policy per workqueue? > > Yeah, sounds fine to me. > > Thanks. > Hi Tejun, If with the kernel config option, every WQ_HIGHPRI is elevated to sched_fifo_low, wouldn't that be kind of defeating the purpose? Having another class for even more urgent work is better in my opinion. Thanks, Sandeep. > -- > tejun
