[Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process] On 16/07/2013 (Tue 13:50) Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:13:50 -0400 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On a similar note, I was thinking about the recent thread on linux-next > > where we were indicating that people shouldn't rebase linux-next content > > on a whim, and that new devel (vs. bugfix) content shouldn't appear in > > the linux-next content during the merge window. There is no question > > that the linux-next process is integral to the main flow of patches to > > mainline, so I think Documentation/development-process/2.Process (the > > same file) should also capture those points in the linux-next section. > > Do you have some pre-canned text we can insert there, or should I draft > > something up for you to review? > > The latter would be certainly easier for me :-) If that is not easy, let > me know and I will write something (even without swearing ;-)). I'll do something for the latter, but I can't promise to refrain from swearing... ;-) Thanks, Paul. -- > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
