Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/1] plca.c: fix obvious mistake in checking retval

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 04:56:11PM +0100, Piergiorgio Beruto wrote:
> This patch addresses a wrong fix that was done during the review
> process. The intention was to substitute "if(ret < 0)" with
> "if(ret)". Unfortunately, in this specific file the intended fix did not
> meet the code. After additional review, it seems like if(ret < 0) was
> actually the right thing to do. So this patch reverts those changes.

Try to reword the patch description without writing "This patch does foo"
(prefer imperative mood over descriptive one).

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux