RE: [PATCH v9 03/13] x86/cpufeatures: Add Bandwidth Monitoring Event Configuration feature flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[AMD Official Use Only - General]

Hi Reinette,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2022 11:11 AM
> To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@xxxxxxx>; corbet@xxxxxxx;
> tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; mingo@xxxxxxxxxx; bp@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx; dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx;
> hpa@xxxxxxxxx; paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx; akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> quic_neeraju@xxxxxxxxxxx; rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx; pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx;
> chang.seok.bae@xxxxxxxxx; pawan.kumar.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx; daniel.sneddon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Das1, Sandipan
> <Sandipan.Das@xxxxxxx>; tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx; james.morse@xxxxxxx;
> linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx; eranian@xxxxxxxxxx; christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx;
> jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx; adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx; quic_jiles@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> peternewman@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/13] x86/cpufeatures: Add Bandwidth Monitoring
> Event Configuration feature flag
> 
> Hi Babu,
> 
> On 12/1/2022 7:36 AM, Babu Moger wrote:
> > Newer AMD processors support the new feature Bandwidth Monitoring
> > Event Configuration (BMEC).
> >
> > The feature support is identified via CPUID Fn8000_0020_EBX_x0 (ECX=0).
> > Bits    Field Name    Description
> > 3       EVT_CFG       Bandwidth Monitoring Event Configuration (BMEC)
> >
> > Currently, the bandwidth monitoring events mbm_total_bytes and
> 
> Please drop "Currently,".
Sure.
> 
> > mbm_local_bytes are set to count all the total and local reads/writes
> > respectively. With the introduction of slow memory, the two counters
> > are not enough to count all the different types of memory events. With
> > the feature BMEC, the users have the option to configure
> > mbm_total_bytes and mbm_local_bytes to count the specific type of
> > events.
> >
> > Each BMEC event has a configuration MSR, which contains one field for
> > each bandwidth type that can be used to configure the bandwidth event
> > to track any combination of supported bandwidth types. The event will
> > count requests from every bandwidth type bit that is set in the
> > corresponding configuration register.
> >
> > Following are the types of events supported:
> >
> > ====    ========================================================
> > Bits    Description
> > ====    ========================================================
> > 6       Dirty Victims from the QOS domain to all types of memory
> > 5       Reads to slow memory in the non-local NUMA domain
> > 4       Reads to slow memory in the local NUMA domain
> > 3       Non-temporal writes to non-local NUMA domain
> > 2       Non-temporal writes to local NUMA domain
> > 1       Reads to memory in the non-local NUMA domain
> > 0       Reads to memory in the local NUMA domain
> > ====    ========================================================
> >
> > By default, the mbm_total_bytes configuration is set to 0x7F to count
> > all the event types and the mbm_local_bytes configuration is set to
> > 0x15 to count all the local memory events.
> >
> > Feature description is available in the specification, "AMD64
> > Technology Platform Quality of Service Extensions, Revision: 1.03
> > Publication
> 
> Missing end quote above.
Ok.
> 
> >
> > Link:
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> > amd.com%2Fen%2Fsupport%2Ftech-docs%2Famd64-technology-platform-
> quality
> > -service-
> extensions&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbabu.moger%40amd.com%7Cbf8c3716
> >
> eed74809726508dadebfbee2%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%
> 7C0%7C
> >
> 638067212372390994%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMD
> AiLCJQIjo
> >
> iV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdat
> a=nLkb
> >
> Wj%2FCed7gAf%2B8qfEec%2FMa1lKgi83EsPZs%2FU%2FOLWc%3D&amp;reserv
> ed=0
> > Link:
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugz
> >
> illa.kernel.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D206537&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbab
> u.m
> >
> oger%40amd.com%7Cbf8c3716eed74809726508dadebfbee2%7C3dd8961fe488
> 4e608e
> >
> 11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C638067212372390994%7CUnknown%7CTWFpb
> GZsb3d8ey
> >
> JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7
> C300
> >
> 0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=DTiTxeQYtjCz50emuxvoHFJbOPJUO0qcUHjwnQAxP3
> o%3D&am
> > p;reserved=0
> > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Same comment about "Link:" ordering as for patch 1.

Sure.
> 
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h |    1 +
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c   |    2 ++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c    |    1 +
> >  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> > index b6a45e56cd0c..415796d7b309 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> > @@ -308,6 +308,7 @@
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_CALL_DEPTH		(11*32+19) /* "" Call depth
> tracking for RSB stuffing */
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_MSR_TSX_CTRL	(11*32+20) /* "" MSR
> IA32_TSX_CTRL (Intel) implemented */
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_SMBA		(11*32+21) /* Slow Memory
> Bandwidth Allocation */
> > +#define X86_FEATURE_BMEC		(11*32+22) /* Bandwidth
> Monitoring Event Configuration */
> >
> >  /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:1 (EAX), word 12 */
> >  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX_VNNI		(12*32+ 4) /* AVX VNNI
> instructions */
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
> > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
> > index d95221117129..f6748c8bd647 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
> > @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ static const struct cpuid_dep cpuid_deps[] = {
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_CQM_OCCUP_LLC,
> 	X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC   },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_TOTAL,
> 	X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC   },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_LOCAL,
> 	X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC   },
> > +	{ X86_FEATURE_BMEC,
> 	X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_TOTAL   },
> > +	{ X86_FEATURE_BMEC,
> 	X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_LOCAL   },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_AVX512_BF16,		X86_FEATURE_AVX512VL  },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_AVX512_FP16,		X86_FEATURE_AVX512BW  },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD,			X86_FEATURE_XSAVES
> },
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c index d925753084fb..0dad49a09b7a
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_bit cpuid_bits[] = {
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_PROC_FEEDBACK,    CPUID_EDX, 11, 0x80000007, 0 },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_MBA,		CPUID_EBX,  6, 0x80000008, 0 },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_SMBA,		CPUID_EBX,  2, 0x80000020, 0 },
> > +	{ X86_FEATURE_BMEC,		CPUID_EBX,  3, 0x80000020, 0 },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2,	CPUID_EAX,  0, 0x80000022, 0 },
> >  	{ X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_V2,	CPUID_EAX,  1, 0x80000022, 0 },
> >  	{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }
> >
> >
> 
> With changelog comments addressed:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks Babu
> 
> Reinette




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux