On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 10:46:43AM +0200, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote: > >> +It's at this stage that the virtqueues will be allocated and configured > >> +by calling the appropriate ``virtio_find`` helper function, such as > >> +virtio_find_single_vq() or virtio_find_vqs(), which will end up > >> +calling a transport-specific ``find_vqs`` method. > >> + > > > > Looks like the wording at the beginning confuses me, so better say: > > > > ---- >8 ---- > > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/virtio/virtio.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/virtio/virtio.rst > > index 07fd2d7c51e689..7947b4ca690efd 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/virtio/virtio.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/virtio/virtio.rst > > @@ -123,10 +123,10 @@ When the device is registered to the virtio bus the kernel will look > > for a driver in the bus that can handle the device and call that > > driver's ``probe`` method. > > I think this is a matter of style as well, maybe a native speaker can > pitch in about the correctness of it. > > Cheers, > Ricardo I think I agree with this comment. This seems minor enough so I applied the patch for now. Bagas would you like to post your suggestion as a patch on top? Would be appreciated. Thanks! -- MST
