dropping stephen becuase of bounce
On 07/10/2013 04:58 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
On 07/10/2013 04:17 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:40:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:33:25PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Here's an idea, trim the damn email ;-) -- not only directed at gleb.
Good idea.
Ingo, Gleb,
From the results perspective, Andrew Theurer, Vinod's test results
are
pro-pvspinlock.
Could you please help me to know what will make it a mergeable
candidate?.
I need to spend more time reviewing it :) The problem with PV
interfaces
is that they are easy to add but hard to get rid of if better solution
(HW or otherwise) appears.
How so? Just make sure the registration for the PV interface is
optional; that
is, allow it to fail. A guest that fails the PV setup will either
have to try
another PV interface or fall back to 'native'.
Forgot to add. Yes currently pvspinlocks are not enabled by default and
also, we have jump_label mechanism to enable it.
[...]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
