[PATCH 0/2] error-injection: Clarify the requirements of error injectable functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Here are the patches for clarifying the requirement of error injectable
functions and remove confusing EI_ETYPE_NONE.

Here is the thread of discussions which leads this series.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/167019256481.3792653.4369637751468386073.stgit@devnote3/T/#u

I agreed that NACK the taint flag itself, and I thought I need to update
the function error injection so that the developers understand the
requirements and carefully use the ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION() macro.
So I removed the confusing EI_ETYPE_NONE (this should not be there,
use errno instead), and update the document about error injectable
functions.

Thank you,

---

Masami Hiramatsu (Google) (2):
      error-injection: Remove EI_ETYPE_NONE
      docs: fault-injection: Add requirements of error injectable functions


 Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.rst |   65 +++++++++++++++++++++
 include/asm-generic/error-injection.h             |    7 +-
 include/linux/error-injection.h                   |    2 -
 lib/error-inject.c                                |    2 -
 4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux