Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] x86/cpu: Define a scattered No Nested Data Breakpoints feature bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/5/22 4:23 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 07:49:57PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
@@ -307,6 +307,7 @@
  #define X86_FEATURE_SGX_EDECCSSA	(11*32+18) /* "" SGX EDECCSSA user leaf function */
  #define X86_FEATURE_CALL_DEPTH		(11*32+19) /* "" Call depth tracking for RSB stuffing */
  #define X86_FEATURE_MSR_TSX_CTRL	(11*32+20) /* "" MSR IA32_TSX_CTRL (Intel) implemented */
+#define X86_FEATURE_NO_NESTED_DATA_BP	(11*32+21) /* "" AMD No Nested Data Breakpoints */

Right, what is the use of this bit in a KVM guest? Running perf tool in
a guest would use that bit how?

This is starting to get off-topic.  Propagating that bit to
the guest was originally added by:

commit 58b3d12c0a860cda34ed9d2378078ea5134e6812
Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Oct 28 13:26:38 2021 -0400

    KVM: x86: add support for CPUID leaf 0x80000021

In the future, it will be used by:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221201021948.9259-1-aik@xxxxxxx/

to allow hardware swapping of debug registers.

If it can't be used in the nested VM case, I can remove the
guest propagation code for it from PATCH 4/7 with a Fixes: for
the above commit, but this 1/7 PATCH will remain.

Thanks,

Kim



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux