Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] RISC-V: resort all extensions in consistent orders

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2022, 00:41:25 CET schrieb Conor Dooley:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Ordering between each and every list of extensions is wildly
> inconsistent. Per discussion on the lists pick the following policy:
> 
> - The array defining order in /proc/cpuinfo follows a narrow
>   interpretation of the ISA specifications, described in a comment
>   immediately presiding it.
> 
> - All other lists of extensions are sorted alphabetically.
> 
> This will hopefully allow for easier review & future additions, and
> reduce conflicts between patchsets as the number of extensions grows.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221129144742.2935581-2-conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@xxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux