On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 4:41 PM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 11/30/22 14:01, chengkaitao wrote: > > From: chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Yikes! Another patch from ZTE guys. > > I'm suspicious to patches sent from them due to bad reputation with > kernel development community. First, they sent all patches via > cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx (listed in Cc) but Greg can't sure these are really > sent from them ([1] & [2]). Then they tried to workaround by sending > from their personal Gmail accounts, again with same response from him > [3]. And finally they sent spoofed emails (as he pointed out in [4]) - > they pretend to send from ZTE domain but actually sent from their > different domain (see raw message and look for X-Google-Original-From: > header. Hi Bagas Sanjaya, I'm not an employee of ZTE, just an ordinary developer. I really don't know all the details about community and ZTE, The reason why I cc cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx is because the output of the script <get_maintainer.pl> has the address <cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx>. If there is any error in the format of the email, I will try my best to correct it. > > I was about to review documentation part of this patch, but due to > concerns above, I have to write this reply instead. So I'm not going > to review, sorry for inconvenience. > > PS: Adding Greg to Cc: list. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yw94xsOp6gvdS0UF@xxxxxxxxx/ > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yylv5hbSBejJ58nt@xxxxxxxxx/ > [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y1EVnZS9BalesrC1@xxxxxxxxx/ > [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y3NrBvIV7lH2GrWz@xxxxxxxxx/ > > -- > An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara > -- Yours, Kaitao Cheng
