Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Fixed a typo in atomic_t.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 06:50:59PM +0530, Kushagra Verma wrote:
> Fixed a typo in the word 'architecture'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kushagra Verma <kushagra765@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Good eyes!  Queued for further review, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  Documentation/atomic_t.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> index 0f1ffa03db09..d7adc6d543db 100644
> --- a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ atomic operations.
>  
>  Specifically 'simple' cmpxchg() loops are expected to not starve one another
>  indefinitely. However, this is not evident on LL/SC architectures, because
> -while an LL/SC architecure 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
> +while an LL/SC architecture 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
>  guarantees between competing LL/SC sections, such a guarantee does not
>  transfer to cmpxchg() implemented using LL/SC. Consider:
>  
> -- 
> 2.38.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux