On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 06:06:32PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:13:37PM +0800, Chao Peng wrote:
> > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> > +static struct file *restrictedmem_file_create(struct file *memfd)
> > +{
> > + struct restrictedmem_data *data;
> > + struct address_space *mapping;
> > + struct inode *inode;
> > + struct file *file;
> > +
> > + data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!data)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > + data->memfd = memfd;
> > + mutex_init(&data->lock);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&data->notifiers);
> > +
> > + inode = alloc_anon_inode(restrictedmem_mnt->mnt_sb);
> > + if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
> > + kfree(data);
> > + return ERR_CAST(inode);
> > + }
> > +
> > + inode->i_mode |= S_IFREG;
> > + inode->i_op = &restrictedmem_iops;
> > + inode->i_mapping->private_data = data;
> > +
> > + file = alloc_file_pseudo(inode, restrictedmem_mnt,
> > + "restrictedmem", O_RDWR,
> > + &restrictedmem_fops);
> > + if (IS_ERR(file)) {
> > + iput(inode);
> > + kfree(data);
> > + return ERR_CAST(file);
> > + }
> > +
> > + file->f_flags |= O_LARGEFILE;
> > +
> > + mapping = memfd->f_mapping;
> > + mapping_set_unevictable(mapping);
> > + mapping_set_gfp_mask(mapping,
> > + mapping_gfp_mask(mapping) & ~__GFP_MOVABLE);
>
> Is this supposed to prevent migration of pages being used for
> restrictedmem/shmem backend?
Yes, my bad. I expected it to prevent migration, but it is not true.
Looks like we need to bump refcount in restrictedmem_get_page() and reduce
it back when KVM is no longer use it.
Chao, could you adjust it?
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
