Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/11/2022 11.12, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 11:17:50PM +0100, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
User space can use the MEM_OP ioctl to make storage key checked reads
and writes to the guest, however, it has no way of performing atomic,
key checked, accesses to the guest.
Extend the MEM_OP ioctl in order to allow for this, by adding a cmpxchg
mode. For now, support this mode for absolute accesses only.

This mode can be use, for example, to set the device-state-change
indicator and the adapter-local-summary indicator atomically.

Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h |   5 ++
  arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h  |   3 ++
  arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c  | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c |  35 +++++++++++++-
  4 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 0d5d4419139a..1f36be5493e6 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -588,6 +588,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_mem_op {
  		struct {
  			__u8 ar;	/* the access register number */
  			__u8 key;	/* access key, ignored if flag unset */
+			__u8 pad1[6];	/* ignored */
+			__u64 old_p;	/* ignored if flag unset */

Just one comment: the suffix "_p" for pointer is quite unusual within
the kernel. This also would be the first of its kind within kvm.h.
Usually there is either no suffix or "_addr".
So for consistency reasons I would suggest to change this to one of
the common variants.

The code itself looks good from my point of view, even though for the
sake of simplicity I would have put the complete sign/zero extended
128 bit old value into the structure, instead of having a pointer to
the value.

See https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/37197cfe-d109-332f-089b-266d7e8e23f8@xxxxxxxxxx/ ... it would break the "IOW" definition of the ioctl. It can be done, but that confuses tools like valgrind, as far as I know. So I think the idea with the pointer is better in this case.

 Thomas




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux