Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] arm64: errata: Workaround possible Cortex-A715 [ESR|FAR]_ELx corruption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 07:39:15PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h
> index d20f5da2d76f..6a4a1ab8eb23 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,15 @@ extern pte_t huge_ptep_get(pte_t *ptep);
>  
>  void __init arm64_hugetlb_cma_reserve(void);
>  
> +#define huge_ptep_modify_prot_start huge_ptep_modify_prot_start
> +extern pte_t huge_ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +					 unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep);
> +
> +#define huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit
> +extern void huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +					 unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
> +					 pte_t old_pte, pte_t new_pte);

I wonder whether we should have kept this as static inline in the header
file. But we can move them later if anyone complains of a performance
regression.

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux