On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 05:33:27 -0500, mtahhan@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Fixup bpf_map_update_elem() declaration to use a single line. > > Signed-off-by: Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Akira > --- > Documentation/bpf/map_cpumap.rst | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/map_cpumap.rst b/Documentation/bpf/map_cpumap.rst > index eaf57b38cafd..61a797a86342 100644 > --- a/Documentation/bpf/map_cpumap.rst > +++ b/Documentation/bpf/map_cpumap.rst > @@ -48,8 +48,7 @@ Userspace > program will result in the program failing to load and a verifier warning. > > .. c:function:: > - int bpf_map_update_elem(int fd, const void *key, const void *value, > - __u64 flags); > + int bpf_map_update_elem(int fd, const void *key, const void *value, __u64 flags); > > CPU entries can be added or updated using the ``bpf_map_update_elem()`` > helper. This helper replaces existing elements atomically. The ``value`` parameter